Proceeding contribution from Glenda Jackson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on Defendant Anonymity.
Defendant Anonymity
I entirely agree with my hon. Friend that there has been an improvement in approaches to rape, but is not the underlying factor that informs—in my view, informs absolutely—what the Government are proposing the view that rape is an "avoidable" crime? It is assumed, for example, that if the woman had worn a longer skirt or drunk rather less or had not placed herself in situations that the external eye regards as dangerous, the rape could have been avoided. Would not the according of anonymity to an alleged perpetrator of rape simply reinforce that total fallacy, which it is so difficult to change?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c562
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Rape Trials Victims Rights of accused
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:22:31 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654099
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654099
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654099