Proceeding contribution from Stewart Hosie (Scottish National Party) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
First, the entire premise of the fixed-term deficit consolidation strategy is wrong. I have already explained that, as I also did to the hon. Gentleman's colleague, the hon. Member for St Ives (Andrew George), in a previous debate, and to another of his hon. Friends in a debate before that. On Trident, I was careful to say that over the medium term we would get the savings from the cancellation and the non-replacement. These are political choices. There would be savings almost immediately from cancellation and non-replacement, and savings of some £50 billion over the medium term—and, as I have said, the Liberals did appear at one point in the election to believe in this, before they changed their minds.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c842
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Poverty Charities Exemptions Excise duties Fuels Economic situation Pensioners Low incomes Rural areas Taxation VAT Rescue services Tax burden Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-06 09:32:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655014
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655014
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655014