Proceeding contribution from Lord Whitty (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Academies Bill [HL].
Academies Bill [HL]
My Lords, if you still allow consultation to take place as "or after" implies in subsection (3), you are not wholeheartedly committed to consultation. I respect everybody’s views, I respect the experience that the noble Baronesses, Lady Perry and Lady Walmsley, have referred to, but it still allows for a sham consultation to take place. I would like to close that door and therefore would like to test the opinion of the House. Division on Amendment 3 Contents 163; Not-Contents 210. Amendment 3 disagreed. Clause 5: Consultation on conversion Amendment 4 not moved. Amendment 5 Tabled by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 720 c627
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Finance Education Governing bodies Expenditure Local government Parents Public consultation Primary education Standards Special educational needs Secondary education Academies Free schools
- Legislation
- Academies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:53:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655438
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655438
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655438