Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Academies Bill [HL].
Academies Bill [HL]
I was not disputing for one moment that it is an important issue. I was attempting, however crudely, to make the point that, with regard to consultation, which is the purpose of these amendments, I was not clear, as I listened to his points, precisely how they related to the amendments. As for my noble friend Lord Phillips, I have difficulty because he always asks such intelligent, perceptive and well-argued questions. My noble friend asked whether the Secretary of State will have to take the impact into account. The answer to that question is yes. Amendment 6 agreed. Amendment 7 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 720 c638
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Finance Education Governing bodies Expenditure Local government Parents Public consultation Primary education Standards Special educational needs Secondary education Academies Free schools
- Legislation
- Academies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:53:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655459
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655459
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655459