Proceeding contribution from Ed Balls (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Academies Bill [Lords].
Academies Bill [Lords]
After two weeks of waiting for an answer, my expectations were not very high. Let me try another question. Is it not the case that the Secretary of State was also advised of the risk of legal challenges from private contractors, and did he not personally decide to ignore that advice? He can set the record straight now, or we can keep on asking these questions. People want to know the answers. This is about the cack-handed way in which he did this, and about whether there will be legal challenges from the authorities and contractors who will have been left out of pocket by hundreds of millions of pounds as a result of his decision.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 514 c39
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Admissions City technology colleges Finance Education Free school meals Pupil exclusions Personal, social, health and economic education Standards Special educational needs School choice Religion Academies Building schools for the future programme Free schools Relationships and sex education Maintained schools
- Legislation
- Academies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:47:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656478
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656478
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656478