Proceeding contribution from Bill Esterson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Academies Bill [Lords].
Academies Bill [Lords]
No, I am not giving way. By cutting the Building Schools for the Future and the primary capital programmes and the area-based grants, the Tories are saying, ““If you come from a deprived area or from a struggling school, we're not going to support you. We will only support those schools that need it least.”” Jack Stopforth of Liverpool chamber commerce commented:"““It's all very well to talk about short-term savings for the public purse, but the long-term implications for the education base of our children and the future skills base and the effect on the private sector supply chain is profound.””" When people in that sort of position make such comments, it is time that Government Members considered the damage that the legislation will do. They should reconsider it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 514 c116
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Admissions City technology colleges Finance Education Free school meals Pupil exclusions Personal, social, health and economic education Standards Special educational needs School choice Religion Academies Building schools for the future programme Free schools Relationships and sex education Maintained schools
- Legislation
- Academies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:40:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656697
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656697
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656697