Proceeding contribution from Bridget Phillipson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 21 July 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Social Housing (Houghton and Sunderland South).
Social Housing (Houghton and Sunderland South)
The argument that the Minister makes is a good one in many ways. He refers to 1946 as a key point. Much of my constituency is composed of post-war modern developments built when Britain was groaning under the weight of the debt we accrued to fight the second world war. Surely, sometimes it is a question of priorities. We choose to prioritise what matters, and if we choose to prioritise housing, we not only secure the future of our communities and regenerate them, but, equally, create much-needed jobs in a time of deficit. I accept the Minister's point that the previous Government should have done more on social housing. I pushed hard on that point. I would contend that latterly they were doing more, but that the rug is now being pulled—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 514 c135WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Housing Housing stock Social rented housing Sunderland North East Houghton-le-Spring
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:15:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_658250
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_658250
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_658250