Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 September 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Controls on Legal Highs.
Controls on Legal Highs
The hon. Gentleman makes an important point. In circumstances in which legislation subsequently changes, the criminal sanction still stands. That is why we have focused on the supply and public harm issues, rather than creating a possession offence. If the ACMD were subsequently to determine that a drug under the temporary classification was not to move into a permanent classification, and someone had been convicted after an offence had been identified and a prosecution secured, that offence would still stand. That underlines the need for the protocol with the ACMD, which I have mentioned, allowing us to seek advice from it on the use of the temporary ban in the first place. That may be done on a more fast-track basis, but certain tenets need to be applied to that process, because the intention in using the temporary ban is not, as I have said, to circumvent the existing system but to use it. Issues to do with mephedrone and other legal highs have highlighted the potential need to act quickly, from a public harm perspective, and that is the focus of our intent.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c154WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Drugs Misuse Mephedrone
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:45:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_663680
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_663680
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_663680