Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 September 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Controls on Legal Highs.


Controls on Legal Highs

I cannot comment on the countenance of reporting in The Observer, but I can send out a very clear message from this debate—the Government do not believe that decriminalisation is the right approach. Our priorities are clear. We want to reduce drug use, crack down on drug-related crime and disorder, and help addicts come off drugs for good. That is the emphasis of Government policy. I would like to come on to the specific points that have been raised, and, in particular, the important point raised by the hon. Member for Barrow and Furness (John Woodcock) on the Medicines Act. The Act applies to medicinal products, so we need to establish certain key components—in other words, that a substance has psychoactive properties and is potentially meant for human consumption. That is where those who have sought to subvert the law through using certain phraseology in their advertisements have sought to obviate medicines control legislation. I assure the hon. Gentleman that we remain in close contact with the Department of Health, as well as trading standards, to see how we can use the Medicines Act more effectively and to explore those options. I agree with him that it is absurd that products can be marketed as bath salts and other things, and are ““not for human consumption””, when implicitly they may be intended to be so used, or there is recklessness. We are carefully exploring this area to see what enforcement options exist. The points about the protocol and triggers are important. The purpose of the working protocol is to set out our engagement with the ACMD, and, through it, any legal controls on dealing with legal highs would be enacted. I am in close consultation with the ACMD to develop that working protocol, because it is important to give reassurance that the temporary banning power is appropriate. As I said to the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake), the Government remain committed to the general response to the drugs being based on the existing framework under the Misuse of Drugs Act and on how the ACMD normally operates. Clarity over the protocol and the triggers, and setting out it in the working protocol with the ACMD are important to give reassurance on how we would use the temporary banning power.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c168-9WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Drugs Misuse Mephedrone
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk