Proceeding contribution from Mark Hoban (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Equitable Life (Payments) Bill.
Equitable Life (Payments) Bill
The appeals mechanism is not the Bill. However, I took on board the point that hon. Gentleman made during the statement about the need for an appeals mechanism, and I have raised that with my officials. I agree, too, that it is important that any appeal is dealt with quickly, but of course that requires co-operation both on the part of the person making the appeal and the body adjudicating on the appeal. Part of the problem that we all face is that we are talking about premiums that have been paid back in the early '90s, so clearly for some of those making appeals there may be an issue about the availability of paperwork and documentation. I am very mindful of that point, and we will pursue it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c764
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Financial services Insolvency Equitable Life Assurance Society Pensioners Payments Regulation Equitable Life Ex-gratia Payment Scheme Review Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Equitable Members Action Group
- Legislation
- Equitable Life (Payments) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:38:59 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664409
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664409
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664409