Proceeding contribution from David Burrowes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Equitable Life (Payments) Bill.
Equitable Life (Payments) Bill
For the benefit of my constituents, I want to establish where the Opposition sit on this matter. I understand that one of their critiques of the Government is that they have not responded more quickly to the Chadwick report. Is it right to say that had the Opposition been in government they would, within two weeks, have accepted the Chadwick report and proceeded on the ““unsafe and unsound basis”” that the ombudsman criticises? Which side of the fence does the right hon. Gentleman think that policyholders would sit? Would they wish to proceed with the Opposition—within two weeks on the Chadwick proposal—or to take account, as the Government are doing, not simply of Chadwick but of wider views?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c779
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Financial services Insolvency Equitable Life Assurance Society Pensioners Payments Regulation Equitable Life Ex-gratia Payment Scheme Review Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Equitable Members Action Group
- Legislation
- Equitable Life (Payments) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:38:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664488
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664488
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664488