Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Charlie Elphicke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Equitable Life (Payments) Bill.


Equitable Life (Payments) Bill

I, too, would like to congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Congleton (Fiona Bruce) on her excellent maiden speech. I have subsequently spent much of the debate dreaming of Sandbach. I recently held a public meeting in east Kent for my constituents in Dover and Deal, alongside my hon. Friend the Member for South Thanet (Laura Sandys) and her constituents in Sandwich, Ramsgate, Broadstairs and other parts of her constituency. It was a lively meeting, and I undertook to report to the House the representations that were made to us. There were three clear positions that the Equitable Life victims wanted me to communicate. The first was that the Chadwick report is not a sound basis for compensation, and that the contributory negligence concept implicit in it is entirely rejected. The second was that the ombudsman's recommendations should be implemented, even if over a number of years with staged payments. The third was that payments should commence as soon as possible. For my part, I would like to say how sorry I am that the victims have been treated so badly for so long. I welcome the Bill, the compensation scheme and the action that is being taken.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c837 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Financial services Insolvency Equitable Life Assurance Society Pensioners Payments Regulation Equitable Life Ex-gratia Payment Scheme Review Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Equitable Members Action Group
Legislation
Equitable Life (Payments) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk