Proceeding contribution from Diana Johnson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 September 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Accident and Emergency Services.
Accident and Emergency Services
With the greatest of respect, I do wish to be political, although I do not want in any way to rewrite history. I understand very well the events that the hon. Gentleman has just set out, which happened under the last Labour Government. However, what concerns me now is that we have a coalition Government who have made contradictory statements about their plans for reconfiguration of services. The hon. Gentleman is faced with a particular issue in his constituency. At the moment, there seems to be confusion. Overwhelmingly, GPs in Burnley do not want the transfer of services to go ahead, but their feelings are being completely ignored by the PCT. I do not wish to intrude on private grief, because obviously this is a matter for the hon. Gentleman's Government to deal with, but I just want to point out that that is an example of the contradiction that exists at the moment and the confusion that exists around the country.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c212WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Health services Emergencies General practitioners NHS Location Waiting lists Standards Accident and emergency departments Paediatrics Southport NHS 111
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:41:17 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664689
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664689
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_664689