Proceeding contribution from Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Savings Accounts and Health in Pregnancy Grant Bill.
Savings Accounts and Health in Pregnancy Grant Bill
I thank the hon. Lady for that useful clarification. The health in pregnancy benefit is paid to ladies towards the end of their pregnancy so that they can eat properly. Again, my wife was entitled to it. I have in the past been mobbed up somewhat on nannies and issues relating to that subject, but the one type of nanny of which I most firmly disapprove is the nanny state. This patronising approach, saying to these ladies, ““You ought to eat your greens and here's some money so you can do so,”” is not what government is about. The Government are here to allow people to lead their lives as freely as they possibly may, without interference from the state while also providing a safety net for those who fall on hard times, not to tell people how to lead their lives, at the expense of the taxpayer and the economy.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 517 c247
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Children in care Child trust fund Grants Personal savings Low incomes Poverty Pregnancy Saving gateway
- Legislation
- Savings Accounts and Health in Pregnancy Grant Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:30:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_673245
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_673245
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_673245