Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Oliver Letwin (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 November 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Departmental Business Plans.


Departmental Business Plans

My hon. Friend is absolutely right that the Select Committees play a vital role in that respect. This approach puts vastly more power in the hands of the Select Committees, because the biggest obstacle to their power is, of course, lack of information—and this approach opens the whole thing up. This is not just a question of the structural reform plans and the dates, on which of course Committees can interrogate, as they can interrogate explanations when things go wrong; it is also about the details of the input costs—what we are putting in—the things that have been achieved on the ground and the outcomes, by which I mean how good it is for the final customer. That gives a Select Committee the ability to haul the relevant Secretary of State up before it and say, ““Look, you said you were going to do this.”” The Committee could then say: ““You did not do it””; ““You did it, but at a greater cost than you said””; ““You did it at the cost but it did not turn out to produce things””; or ““It did produce things but the outcomes were not good enough.”” That is a very powerful interrogative tool. Hon. Members may ask why we would subject ourselves to this. The answer is because we think that it is how we will produce a better Government.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
518 c29-30 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Departmental responsibilities Government departments Standards Business plans
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk