Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Cobbold (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 November 2010. It occurred during Question for short debate on Parliament: Elected House of Lords.


Parliament: Elected House of Lords

My Lords, I am one of those who feels strongly that the proposal to turn the present House of Lords into a wholly or partly elected Chamber is not reform but abolition. It is the abolition of an institution that has a unique history and performs a valuable function in the scrutiny of new legislation, while at the same time recognising the supremacy of the House of Commons. An elected senate would be bound to challenge that supremacy. The strength of the House of Lords is the experience and expertise of its Members in most walks of life. They have made a mark in life and would be reluctant to stand for election. A new senate would be more party political and considerably more expensive. Another question is whether the public are ready for yet another election. The Deputy Prime Minister said in his Statement on 5 July that it is important to avoid asking people to keep traipsing to the ballot box. There is room for some reform measures—for example, those set out in the Bill of the noble Lord, Lord Steel—but I do not believe that an elected Chamber would improve relations between the two Houses.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c253 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Armed conflict Elections Legislative process House of Lords House of Commons Powers Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Ministers Peers Proportional representation Treaties Reform Censure motions
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk