Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Scott of Foscote (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 November 2010. It occurred during Question for short debate on Parliament: Elected House of Lords.


Parliament: Elected House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to make a few short remarks in the gap. The issue being debated this evening was considered in 1999 and 2000 by the Wakeham commission, whose report came before the House in 2000. For the purposes of its deliberations, the commission engaged an eminent academic at UCL, Meg Russell, who wrote a report for it on each of the western European democracies with two elected Houses. She also wrote a report on the United States, Canada and Australia. The Library very kindly downloaded for me all the reports that she wrote. However, I could not reach the end of them without feeling great gloom at the prospect of this country going through the same troubles and processes that the countries with two elected Houses have had. Moreover, I do not think that anyone could read the reports produced by Meg Russell and still think it a good idea to replace the current system in this country of a healthy constitutional equilibrium between the largely appointed House here and the elected House in the Commons. Those reports by the lady in question are important reading for anyone who retains any lingering wish to have an elected House of Lords.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c259-60 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Armed conflict Elections Legislative process House of Lords House of Commons Powers Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Ministers Peers Proportional representation Treaties Reform Censure motions
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk