Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Evans (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Equitable Life (Payments) Bill.
Equitable Life (Payments) Bill
I was interested in the way in which my hon. Friend dealt with my point about over-bonusing, but I feel that he has undermined another point that I made: I suggested that it was not possible to make such calculations, but my hon. Friend has suggested that Towers Watson has done so. In a sense that also undermines the thrust of why the pre-1992 policyholders should be excluded. I had assumed that they might not have been disadvantaged and that it was too difficult to work out the numbers, but if Towers Watson has worked out those numbers and there is no relative loss, it seems a bit odd not to include them, at least for the purpose of calculating the position and telling them that there is no loss.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 518 c321
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Financial services Insolvency Equitable Life Assurance Society Pensioners Payments Equitable Life Ex-gratia Payment Scheme Review Ex gratia payments National Savings and Investments
- Legislation
- Equitable Life (Payments) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:22:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679229
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679229
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679229