Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Equitable Life (Payments) Bill.
Equitable Life (Payments) Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for the information about National Savings & Investment being the preferred vehicle. In theory, there is a separation between policy, in terms of the scheme design, and operations, in terms of the administration but blurred edges can sometimes appear between the two. Will the independent commission hold the ring in any disputes about the mechanism, timing and administration of the scheme? Who will be the final arbiter of any disputes that arise from the process? Presumably, it will be the independent commission.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 518 c333-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Financial services Insolvency Equitable Life Assurance Society Pensioners Payments Equitable Life Ex-gratia Payment Scheme Review Ex gratia payments National Savings and Investments
- Legislation
- Equitable Life (Payments) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:23:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679256
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679256
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_679256