Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 November 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill.


Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

In a brief intervention some months ago, I acquired an entirely undeserved and unsought reputation for being an expert on hybridity. On that occasion, though, I detected what I thought to be a serious issue that needed to be considered in the way described. On this occasion, I can detect no such issue. I have listened with great care to what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer, has said. I accept that the threshold is a low one, a point that I made on the previous occasion, but an elector’s interest in voting is not a private interest in the sense described in the Standing Orders. There can therefore be no question of treating one private interest differently from another. I am saying, only in a roundabout way, exactly what I believe the Clerk of the Public Bill Office has himself said in the letter that has been mentioned. Before I am asked, I shall say that I have not read—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c533-4 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Constituency size Constituencies Alternative vote General elections Voting methods Reform Hybrid bills
Legislation
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk