Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 November 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill.
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill
In a brief intervention some months ago, I acquired an entirely undeserved and unsought reputation for being an expert on hybridity. On that occasion, though, I detected what I thought to be a serious issue that needed to be considered in the way described. On this occasion, I can detect no such issue. I have listened with great care to what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer, has said. I accept that the threshold is a low one, a point that I made on the previous occasion, but an elector’s interest in voting is not a private interest in the sense described in the Standing Orders. There can therefore be no question of treating one private interest differently from another. I am saying, only in a roundabout way, exactly what I believe the Clerk of the Public Bill Office has himself said in the letter that has been mentioned. Before I am asked, I shall say that I have not read—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c533-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Constituency size Constituencies Alternative vote General elections Voting methods Reform Hybrid bills
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:50:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_681222
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_681222
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_681222