Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on Interim Report: Leader's Group on Members Leaving the House.


Interim Report: Leader's Group on Members Leaving the House

Yes, I have thought about that. It is an important question, but there are commercial and business standards for reducing workloads that are long-term cost-effective to an institution. I would be brutal and say that the needs of the institution are such that we have to change the system of introducing new Members—whether by elections or otherwise is a debate for another day. The figure could be worked out and justified by saying how we arrived at the per head offer. It would not be age discriminatory as that would be indefensible. My plea to the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, is that we must do something about this, although I know that it is not for his committee to decide. He must come to a conclusion and make a recommendation. I hope that he will think seriously about the practical approach that I have suggested. I know that I may be in a minority, but if he does not do that, the danger is that we will stagger on to 2015, which is not in the long-term interests of this institution. I am convinced about that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c693 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Age Elections House of Lords House of Lords composition Payments Peers Reform Retirement House of Lords Leader's Group on Members Leaving the House
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk