Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on Interim Report: Leader's Group on Members Leaving the House.


Interim Report: Leader's Group on Members Leaving the House

My Lords, I assure the noble Lord that I have absolutely no doubt that in the rest of this long Session the Government will be defeated on many occasions, not least with the support of Members of my own party and, indeed, of the coalition. As the noble Lord rightly says, this is a revising Chamber and we have all been here for long enough to know that that is exactly what happens. I said that this has been an interesting debate and it has. Perhaps one of the most entertaining speeches was that of my noble friend Lord Ferrers. Those who heard it were not surprised to hear a vintage speech. If we ever have an age limit, it should be a movable one which should always be set at a year older than the age of my noble friend. I noted that the noble Baroness, Lady Farrington of Ribbleton, jumped up and reminded my noble friend of his views on women Peers in the 1950s. As we would expect, he dealt with that in a very gentlemanly way. However, he ought to remind the noble Baroness that in the House of Commons the party that voted against the introduction of women Peers was the Labour Party. The noble Baroness has cause to be glad that her party lost that vote in the 1950s. My noble friend Lord Ferrers said that we should blame politicians for the state that we are in, but we are where we are and we must go on.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c709 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Age Elections House of Lords House of Lords composition Payments Peers Reform Retirement House of Lords Leader's Group on Members Leaving the House
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk