Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 November 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Public Health.
Public Health
Far be it from me to say that my noble friend makes mistakes. No, he has not misunderstood the situation. The point of the ring-fence is to ensure that the money we supply to local authorities is genuinely used for public health purposes. That is obvious. However, there will be flexibility for local authorities to decide what falls within the public health definition. As long as they can justify their decision that the expenditure is public health-related, they will be free to spend the money accordingly. There may be uses for public health money that involve schools or sport and so on. This, again, is something that we will need to look at when we define how much money there will be—that is being worked out—and in our dialogues with local authorities, to ensure that the rules are absolutely clear.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c1393
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Finance Drugs Health education Local government NHS Misuse Obesity Preventive medicine Screening Smoking Sexually transmitted infections Public Health England Public health
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:38:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_687563
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_687563
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_687563