Proceeding contribution from Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 13 December 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
I have just checked with my right hon. Friend and he is absolutely clear that he did not say that. I say to the right hon. Gentleman, who seems to think that the issue has suddenly arisen in the last minute, that the document that summarises the consultation responses to ““Policing in the 21st century”” states clearly on page 13, at paragraph 2.12:"““Whilst the PCC will be able to appoint staff to advise and assist them, all staff must be appointed on merit and will be politically restricted posts.””" [Interruption.] Hon. Members should wait. It goes on to state:"““Party political office holders and active party members will not be able to be appointed to the PCC's staff.””" Our intention is absolutely clear. The running costs and day-to-day expenditure of police and crime commissioners will not be any greater than that of police authorities.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 520 c713-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Crime Alcoholic drinks Demonstrations Arrest warrants Elections Drugs Police Parliament Square Misuse Licensing laws Police authorities Young people Reform War crimes Police and crime commissioners
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:54:00 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693071
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693071
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693071