Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Hazel Blears (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 December 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Courts Service Estate.


Courts Service Estate

I frankly do not understand the Minister's decision on Salford magistrates court. Not only do we have the support of the Lord Chief Justice—who said that Salford city council's alternative proposal should be supported and the court should remain open—but the city council would have met the maintenance backlog and the ongoing revenue costs for the court. There would have been no cost to the Department. I believe that this decision flies in the face of all logic. We have had a court in our city for 1,000 years, doing fantastic community justice work of the kind that the Minister has talked about. We have had a court for 1,000 years: it has taken this Government just six months to put an end to that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
520 c822;520 c821-2 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Courts Cost effectiveness Closures Buildings Capital investment County courts Magistrates' courts Liverpool Travel Witnesses Victims Video conferencing HM Courts Service Newcastle-under-Lyme Prestatyn Camberwell
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk