Proceeding contribution from Steve Barclay (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 December 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Courts Service Estate.
Courts Service Estate
There will be great dismay at the closure of Ely and Wisbech magistrates courts in North East Cambridgeshire, particularly as the magistrates court in the constituency next door—the Minister's own—is to be retained, as are county court hearings. There were factual errors in the consultation on Wisbech court, such as taking one-off costs as running costs. There were also omissions, such as ignoring the potential of transferring work from Ely to Wisbech to increase its utilisation rate, and underestimates of revenue, involving such elements as charging the police nothing for the use of the court building. In the light of that, will the Minister place in the Library the figures that were used after those errors were pointed out, so that we can see exactly what this decision was based on?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 520 c823-4;520 c823
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Courts Cost effectiveness Closures Buildings Capital investment County courts Magistrates' courts Liverpool Travel Witnesses Victims Video conferencing HM Courts Service Newcastle-under-Lyme Prestatyn Camberwell
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-04-02 10:24:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693613
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693613
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_693613