Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bob Ainsworth (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 December 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate and Backbench debate on Drugs Policy.


Drugs Policy

I will move on to some of those issues later in my speech. The only point on which I disagree with my hon. Friend is his use of the term ““nonsensical””, because we really must get away from flinging insults when discussing the matter. In the days ahead, many insults will be flung at me by sections of the right-wing press, which I knew would happen when I raised the subject, but it will be a great shame if we cannot have a more serious debate on that most serious issue. I have had some busy jobs in the past few years and so might not be as current as I was a short time ago, but I have always argued that the regulatory framework adopted in different countries makes little difference to their levels of drug use. Sweden has a hard attitude to drugs and relatively low drug use. Italy has a softer attitude and relatively low drug use. We have a very hard attitude and relatively high drug use. Holland has a relatively liberal regime and a high incidence of drug use. That tells us that the regulatory framework has little effect on the levels of drug use in those countries.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
520 c343WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Drugs Misuse Policy Regulation Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk