Proceeding contribution from Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 13 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation, volumes I and II (EN-6).
Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation, volumes I and II (EN-6)
Before the Minister leaves that point, can he confirm that, were there not to be any changes in the planning arrangements, the application would still not go to the Secretary of State but remain with the Infrastructure Planning Commission? A comma was probably missing from his statement. I just wanted clarification.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 723 c152GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Cumbria Finance Environment protection Infrastructure Floods Kent Planning permission Planning Radioactive waste Nuclear power Nuclear fuel reprocessing Nuclear power stations Security Waste management Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Mixed oxide fuel
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-18 08:18:24 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700405
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700405
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700405