Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 January 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2011.


Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2011

My Lords, first, I am grateful for the welcome from all noble Lords for the thrust of this order and for their support for it. I fear that I shall need to take advice on some of the specific questions asked by my noble friend Lady Walmsley—particularly about the nature of the regime as it applies in Scotland—and come back to her, because I am afraid that I am not fully sighted on that. I should add that we have all had pyjama parties recently. My noble friend the Duke of Montrose asked about mirrored arrangements and reciprocity. I understand that the arrangement by which information will be passed from Scotland to the other countries is already in place. However, I shall check that and, if I am wrong, I shall write to my noble friend correcting myself. I agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Whitchurch, about the importance of data protection. In looking at these measures, I wanted to satisfy myself as much as I could that proper safeguards would be in place, because, as the noble Baroness said, we are all very conscious of stories about little sticks going missing. I am told that strict safeguards are in place and that Disclosure Scotland also adheres to information security protocols set by a body called the CESG and the Government’s National Technical Authority for Information Assurance. None of the information held by Disclosure Scotland can be stored or transmitted by CD, memory stick or any removable storage device, and no information can ever be transferred to or held on a laptop. I hope that that provides some security on that point. There was a question about costs. The setting of fees is a matter for the Scottish Government, and fees for vetting in England and Wales would be part of the review announcement that will follow in due course from the Home Secretary. I will follow up the other points raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Whitchurch. As she said, they are more directly relevant to the Home Secretary, but if I need to come back to her with a more detailed response, I will do so. Overall, I am grateful for the support expressed for this measure. It is technical in nature but marks an important move forward to help our colleagues in the Scottish Government, and therefore I have great pleasure in commending it. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
724 c188-9GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Protection Scotland Vetting Vulnerable adults Young people Independent Safeguarding Authority Disclosure Scotland
Legislation
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk