Proceeding contribution from Mark Lazarowicz (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 February 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Coastguard Service.
Coastguard Service
I have been in another Committee, which is why I was not here earlier. This issue is important to my constituents and to the constituents of many hon. Members who are here in Westminster Hall today. Of course, my concern is particularly about the Forth coastguard station, which is on the other side of Scotland to my hon. Friend's constituency. The Forth station is also proposed for closure. There is also a sub-centre that covers my constituency's shoreline. In the firth of Forth, we have three major oil and liquid gas terminals. We also have a new bridge and a number of anchorages, and a new wind farm is being built. Does my hon. Friend agree that the firth of Forth is another area where safety means that closure should not go ahead and that having one coastguard station for the whole of Scotland is not acceptable?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 522 c303WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Costs Modernisation Shipping Rescue services Maritime and Coastguard Agency
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:52:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_710431
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_710431
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_710431