Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sassoon (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 February 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.


National Insurance Contributions Bill

My Lords, I will look to see how many non-trading charities have been created in past periods. However, the noble Lord is long on these questions about what might have been the case had we done the estimate on another basis. I will come on to the critical questions of what estimates have been produced in a minute, if he will permit me. I know he likes to come in on my responses to debates with more and more questions, and I shall try to answer some of the ones he asked me earlier. The noble Lord, Lord Myners, and other noble Lords asked questions about the geographic extent of the holiday—of course we are delighted that Cornwall is included. However, London and other areas have been excluded. My noble friend Lord Newby admirably answered the question asked by the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Oldham about London, so I would just refer him to what he already heard the noble Lord, Lord Newby, say. The critical thing is that we are targeting the scheme, as a temporary measure, on providing assistance to those areas that are most reliant on public sector employment as we transition to a more sustainable model of economic growth. I appreciate that if we had a much more complex scheme, which we think would be disproportionate, we could pick out smaller areas. However, given the proportionality of the scheme and its administration, cost and complexity, the targeting we have done achieves the scheme’s main objectives and consciously excludes those areas that are not so dependent on public sector employment. It amuses me somewhat to note that in plenty of other contexts the Government are criticised for not targeting areas sufficiently and here we are targeting them on those areas where the transition is going to be most difficult. The cost of extending the holiday to other regions, on the same basis that we have estimated the other costings, would be: £250 million for Greater London, £250 million for the southeast and £160 million for the east of England. These are not inconsiderable sums.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
724 c1430 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance National insurance contributions Tax allowances Tax thresholds
Legislation
National Insurance Contributions Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk