Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 February 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Proposed Directive (Information Systems).
Proposed Directive (Information Systems)
I hear my hon. Friend's point. We obviously reflected on the conclusion from the Committee's initial response on the directive, which stated:"““We agree that large-scale attacks against information systems are likely to have a cross-border dimension and require close co-operation between Member States. We think that the legal base proposed is appropriate and accept that there is a case for further EU action to respond to new methods and tools for committing cyber crime.””" As he will realise, there is a three-month period in which the UK must respond to those issues. We take scrutiny very seriously. Indeed, making this statement on the Floor of the House underlines the important that we place on allowing scrutiny to be applied. Obviously, the directive still requires more work and consideration in the negotiation, and that is precisely what the Government will do.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 522 c1055
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Computers Cybercrime Expenditure International cooperation Internet EU action Misuse Security Electronic warfare Hacking Cybersecurity
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:49:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_710775
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_710775
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_710775