Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Maddock (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 3 February 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011.


Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011

My Lords, I strongly support many of the things that the noble Lord, Lord Myners, said in support of these orders, particularly the measures that allow for clients’ assets to be recovered more readily. I have three questions. Not only will administrators be able to prioritise the three objectives outlined in the instrument as they see fit, but they will also be able to continue to administer their organisations with a guarantee that suppliers must provide their services for up to a period of 28 days without pay. Have the Government fully identified the potential costs to suppliers who have to continue to provide their services for this period? Secondly, I understand that the regulations allow suppliers to gain a court order to exempt them from this duty if they can prove hardship. Again, can the Government expand a little on the definition of hardship? Lastly, on the bar date by which time claims for assets must be made, will the Government consider setting out what they think might be a reasonable amount of time to allow for claimants to properly state their case? Having posed those questions, in summary I support these regulations and hope that the Government will give proper attention to the suppliers who must provide their services without pay and, of course, those clients who seek to recover their assets.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
724 c1551 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Banks Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Regulation
Legislation
Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011
Investment Bank (Amendment of Definition) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk