Proceeding contribution from Daniel Kawczynski (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 9 February 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Hospital Services (Shropshire).
Hospital Services (Shropshire)
I will reciprocate by referring to the hon. Gentleman as my hon. Friend. We are from different parties but we are colleagues. We get on well, and across the parties we have a passion for Shropshire. I will come later to the importance of retaining services in Shropshire. However, constituents do not pay attention to services that come to their area; they are focused on those that are leaving. That is why they are pressing me to highlight these issues in Parliament. My other concern is that there is no plan B. This is a consultation process in which the chief executive and the board come forward with proposals. However, there are no shades of grey—it is take it or leave it. I speak purely as a layman, but if there is only one option, it is difficult for a large group of people, many of whom do not have medical experience, to scrutinise that proposal. Surely, if we are to genuinely engage with local people, differences and alternative options could be put forward so that the community as a whole could come together, debate them and make recommendations.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 523 c139WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Hospitals Health services Maternity services Wales Shropshire Telford Paediatrics Shrewsbury Royal Shrewsbury Hospital
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:56:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_714184
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_714184
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_714184