Proceeding contribution from Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
I always wait with interest and occasionally trepidation for the points that my hon. Friend makes. [Interruption] I could make a response to the sedentary comment by the hon. Member for Eltham (Clive Efford), but it would probably be better not to do so in the context of the Chamber of the House. On the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Monmouth (David T. C. Davies), the Bill contains a great number of significant measures that will be to the benefit of the people of this country and will ensure that surveillance cameras are used for the proper purposes for which they were introduced.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 524 c213-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Data protection Databases Counter-terrorism Criminal records CCTV Biometrics Fraud Juries Electronic surveillance Homosexuality Fingerprints DNA Immobilisation of vehicles Freedom of expression Local government National security Parking Powers of entry Protection Police Vetting Schools Stop and search Vulnerable adults Information Commissioner's Office
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:40:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719507
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719507
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719507