Proceeding contribution from James Clappison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 March 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on University Admission.
University Admission
That happily brings me to my next point. I imagine that the Minister will say, in his fair way, exactly what he said to the Daily Mail a few months ago. I am sure he will be anxious to reassure us that the Government intend universities to be free to continue to make judgments and admissions based on individual merit. However, in light of the guidance given to universities by the Office for Fair Access, I am afraid I will not able to place as much confidence in the Minister's reassurance as I would like, and it would be stretching my credulity to accept it at face value. In the long directive from the Office for Fair Access, the word ““merit”” appears only once after 25 paragraphs of detailed instructions to universities, backed by the threat of financial pressure:"““so long as individuals are considered on their merits and institutions' procedures are fair, transparent and evidence based.””" That is the only place I can find the word ““merit””, and it appears in much the same place as one would expect to find the legal small print in an advertising brochure.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 524 c190-1WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Admissions Disadvantaged Fees and charges Higher education Students
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:10:00 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_722840
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_722840
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_722840