Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Clappison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 March 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on University Admission.


University Admission

That happily brings me to my next point. I imagine that the Minister will say, in his fair way, exactly what he said to the Daily Mail a few months ago. I am sure he will be anxious to reassure us that the Government intend universities to be free to continue to make judgments and admissions based on individual merit. However, in light of the guidance given to universities by the Office for Fair Access, I am afraid I will not able to place as much confidence in the Minister's reassurance as I would like, and it would be stretching my credulity to accept it at face value. In the long directive from the Office for Fair Access, the word ““merit”” appears only once after 25 paragraphs of detailed instructions to universities, backed by the threat of financial pressure:"““so long as individuals are considered on their merits and institutions' procedures are fair, transparent and evidence based.””" That is the only place I can find the word ““merit””, and it appears in much the same place as one would expect to find the legal small print in an advertising brochure.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
524 c190-1WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Admissions Disadvantaged Fees and charges Higher education Students
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk