Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 March 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2011.
Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2011
It is easy to see that confusion. I shall write to the noble Lord, but I am comfortable in stating that it is a reference to where the obligation to have an impact assessment is, not to who is getting the impact. That is the reason for the difference. However, I shall write to the noble Lord to lay that out very clearly. I am very impressed that anyone has got to note 10.2. I think I have dealt with all the outstanding issues.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 725 c275-6GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Related items
- Subjects
- National insurance Workplace pensions National insurance contributions
- Legislation
- Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:06:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723149
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723149
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723149