Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 March 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2011.


Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2011

Yes, I can confirm that, obviously. There is an argument there: it is a rather complicated sum, not just the sum of what has gone in and out in terms of all of the factors. To the extent that there is an extra cost, it is partly because it has become more expensive to get pensions for one reason or another. Some of that reflects the marketplace and what it costs to purchase annuities outside the Government’s scheme. Rather like me, the noble Lord will, I suspect, have gone through this understanding some, but not all, of the bits in it. However, that is the process, so the saving becomes a cost for employers and employees, given how we have split it. I have one main item on which to write formally to noble Lords but, with that, I hope that I have dealt satisfactorily with the issues. As everyone in this Room will realise, they are highly technical. I commend the draft order to the Committee. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
725 c276GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
National insurance Workplace pensions National insurance contributions
Legislation
Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk