Proceeding contribution from Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 18 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on UN Security Council Resolution (Libya).
UN Security Council Resolution (Libya)
My hon. Friend makes an extremely good point. Of course, there is always a case that goes something like, ββDon't start down this path because it might involve you taking so many difficult steps to achieve it.ββ It seems to me that the stronger argument is that it is better to act than to stand back and do nothing, and witness the slaughter of civilians, when that is so clearly not in our national interest. It is better to act than to remain passive. We have set limits on what we are able to do, because we cannot have an occupying force. I believe that what we are doing can help to protect civilians and can, over time, help to bring about a better future for Libya.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 525 c628
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Demonstrations Armed conflict Human rights Humanitarian aid Politics and government Violence UN resolutions Sanctions Civil disorder Libya Military intervention UN Security Council League of Arab States Gaddafi, Muammar Ceasefires
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-20 15:16:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_728326
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_728326
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_728326