Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 22 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union Bill.


European Union Bill

Different member states have different patterns, including, as the noble Lord will know very well, elaborate referenda procedures, all of which take a very long time. The noble Lord will also be familiar with the German constitutional court and with other constitutional provisions in other member countries. This may be too general a comparison, but I think he will agree that most countries have somewhat more elaborate provisions and controls through constitutional courts and referenda requirements than we have had hitherto in this country. As I was saying, there are some additional proposals which require parliamentary approval by passing a Motion in both Houses. These are provided by Clause 10. A vote in both Houses is therefore a practical solution to enable Parliament to have an appropriate level of control. I hope not to detain your Lordships very much more, but there are one or two final matters which it is right to put before you.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c605 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
EU law EU withdrawal EU accession European communities Powers Referendums Parliamentary scrutiny Sovereignty Treaties Reform UK membership of EU Sunset clauses
Legislation
European Union Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk