Proceeding contribution from Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 22 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union Bill.
European Union Bill
Different member states have different patterns, including, as the noble Lord will know very well, elaborate referenda procedures, all of which take a very long time. The noble Lord will also be familiar with the German constitutional court and with other constitutional provisions in other member countries. This may be too general a comparison, but I think he will agree that most countries have somewhat more elaborate provisions and controls through constitutional courts and referenda requirements than we have had hitherto in this country. As I was saying, there are some additional proposals which require parliamentary approval by passing a Motion in both Houses. These are provided by Clause 10. A vote in both Houses is therefore a practical solution to enable Parliament to have an appropriate level of control. I hope not to detain your Lordships very much more, but there are one or two final matters which it is right to put before you.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 726 c605
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- EU law EU withdrawal EU accession European communities Powers Referendums Parliamentary scrutiny Sovereignty Treaties Reform UK membership of EU Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- European Union Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:43:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_729827
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_729827
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_729827