Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Sarah Wollaston (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 May 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Larch Disease.


Larch Disease

May I back that up by talking about the experience of my constituent, Mr Rob White, who has lost 20 hectares of his Japanese larch under a compulsory felling notice? He is on a planted ancient woodland site and only 50% to 70% of his replanting costs would be covered—even if he planted wholly broadleaf species—and he is seriously considering the extent to which he will replant. He would, of course, like to use his common sense and replant a range of species; he has talked to me about replanting Sitka spruce and Douglas fir, which are relatively disease-resistant, and he would also like to mix in some broadleaf species. Does my hon. Friend feel that we should trust our constituents to use their common sense in that regard?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c244-5WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Compensation Diseases Disease control Forests Tree felling Trees South West
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk