Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Fiona Mactaggart (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 9 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on Trafficking in Human Beings.


Trafficking in Human Beings

The Opposition will support any effective border measures that help to protect this country's borders against illegal immigration and to prevent the victimisation of people through trafficking. We are absolutely on side when it comes to both those things. The targets that existed under previous nationally initiated police operations are, in my view, necessary to make this kind of work, which I welcome, operate effectively. Another theme in the directive is the importance of looking after victims. I am concerned about the recent decision to replace POPPY as the provider of victim care. I think that the POPPY project was the most exemplary pioneer in its work on victim care. One thing it was prepared to do because of its independence was to challenge decisions on behalf of victims who were not identified as victims by the national referral mechanism. Will the Minister give a guarantee that the present arrangements for providing victim care will include a willingness to act on behalf of those victims who have not been identified by what amounts, frankly, to a bit of a tick-box exercise when it comes to the questionnaires issued by the NRM? Will the new victim care arrangements allow decisions by the NRM to be challenged so that people who have not been designated as victims of trafficking can be properly protected?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c981 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Human trafficking EU action
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk