Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Fiona Mactaggart (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 9 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on Trafficking in Human Beings.


Trafficking in Human Beings

That is what the contract requires of the new organisation. I did not make any criticism of it because I wish it well. It has the job now, although I am sad that POPPY's talent is potentially going to be lost as it had powerful experience to bring to bear on the problem. I asked for a specific assurance that the new organisation will be allowed to challenge—and provided with the finance, perhaps retrospectively—in cases where its advisers and support staff believe that a decision by the NRM has been inaccurate. I put that question to the Minister and I am sure he will come back to it in his reply. I accept that we need value-for-money services. Personally, I thought POPPY provided pretty good value for money for the women victims whom it supported and I hope that the new arrangements will provide a similar quality of support for women, which is gender sensitive and so forth. I know that part of the ambition was to extend it beyond trafficked women to male victims of trafficking—an initiative that I welcome—but I hope we will continue to have the gender sensitivity that is required in the directive and that POPPY so exemplarily displayed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c981-2 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Human trafficking EU action
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk