Proceeding contribution from Justine Greening (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base.
Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base
Perhaps if I make a little more progress, it will help hon. Members to understand the Government's position in a little more detail and where we are in the proposal's development, which it is important to understand. It is also important to understand Parliament's role in the process, which is the whole point of this debate. A number of issues need to be addressed in the policy substance of this proposal. Those issues will have to be discussed among all 27 member states. That is why we have committed to engage in the ongoing EU discussions on this proposal. It is important that the UK participates fully in the negotiations, so that we can seek solutions that meet the interests of the UK and the EU as a whole. Although the issues of subsidiarity and proportionality are fundamental, we need to be ready to engage fully in the negotiations that are starting in Brussels. We need to engage not only in Brussels, but with our fellow member states to ensure that we influence them. For example, member states will need to consider the implications of the proposal for companies operating across the UK, particularly if it were taken forward through enhanced co-operation. We should also seek to ensure that a common consolidated corporate tax base does not undermine UK competitiveness or create opportunities for tax avoidance. Such considerations will involve examining some of the specific issues raised in the European Scrutiny Committee's helpful report, such as the potential implications for the tax treaties and the risk of creating additional administrative burdens on business. Of course, one of the European Commission's arguments is that the proposal will reduce burdens and provide simplification, but, like the Committee, the Government simply do not accept that argument. I turn to some of the specific concerns that the Committee raised in its report. First, I will address the proposal's legal base. Article 115 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union provides for EU legislation that directly affects the single market. In strict legal terms, it is possible to make a case that that article is an acceptable legal base for a proposal such as that that we are discussing, but the Government have broader reservations. We do not believe that a common consolidated corporate tax base is necessary for the internal market to function effectively, and we do not accept the assumptions that appear to underpin the Commission's proposal. At present, we are therefore not convinced that the proposal is consistent with either subsidiarity or proportionality. In this instance, we think it difficult to separate the two, because both centre on whether such an EU mechanism is necessary to achieve the objectives set out by the Commission.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 527 c1283-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Corporation tax EU countries EU action EU economic policy Sovereignty Taxation
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-04 14:44:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_741237
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_741237
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_741237