Proceeding contribution from Lord Tomlinson (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on European Union Bill.
European Union Bill
I shall not oppose the clause standing part, but have one slight comment to the Minister. He referred to compromise, but I remind him that he said earlier that the Bill was a compromise between incompatible policies. We shall come back to this later, because there is incompatibility. At the moment, I can see it being removed only by the withdrawal of Clause 6. However, I am content to accept his advice. Clause 6 agreed. Schedule 1 : Treaty provisions where amendment removing need for unanimity, consensus or common accord would attract referendum Amendment 45 Schedule 1 : Treaty provisions where amendment removing need for unanimity, consensus or common accord would attract referendum Amendment 45 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1358
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Administration of justice Contributions European Union Discrimination Electoral systems EU budget Economic and monetary union EU justice and home affairs Referendums Treaties Treaty on European Union UK membership of EU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
- Legislation
- European Union Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:16:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743520
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743520
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743520