Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Stirrup (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 May 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Nuclear Deterrent.


Nuclear Deterrent

My Lords, does the Minister agree that the only sensible alternatives in this case are the minimum credible nuclear deterrent or no nuclear deterrent at all, not something that falls between the two? Credibility is in the eye of the beholder, so proposed savings around the margins of the nuclear deterrent programme —in themselves, they may be quite large sums but they are necessarily only a small percentage of the total programme—then put at risk the effectiveness of that programme. They do not represent value for money.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c1405 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Costs Nuclear weapons Procurement Nuclear disarmament Safety Nuclear submarines
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk