Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Henig (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 May 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

I rise to support the amendment. Given that thus far with the amendments that have been moved there has not been that much sense of give in the Government’s responses, I would like to know what the thinking was on this provision. I find this whole area of the Bill quite extraordinary and quite out of line with anything else that I have experienced in policing or local government. Given that it is seen by many of us as an extraordinary suggestion, would someone explain where the idea has come from? It is so unprecedented, in my experience. If the response follows the same pattern as on previous amendments and the Minister stands up and tells us why the arguments that we are putting forward are not going to work and why what is being proposed is absolutely perfect and that therefore we should not be challenging it, in this particular case I would like to probe why this provision is in the Bill. It seems bizarre to a lot of people.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c1729 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Accountability Crime prevention Crime British Transport Police Finance Greater London Pilot schemes Police Pay Powers Mergers Mayor of London Police authorities Metropolitan Police Reform Wales City of London Police Civil Nuclear Constabulary Police and crime commissioners
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk