Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on EU: Justice and Home Affairs.


EU: Justice and Home Affairs

I am most grateful to my erstwhile noble friend, but could she be precise as to whether the Government intend to fulfil the commitment given by Mr Lidington that, "““the Government have committed publicly to having a vote in both Houses before making a formal decision on whether we wish to opt in or out””?—[Official Report, Commons, 26/1/11; col. 399.]" That was really my main question. Everything since then refers to Parliament being kept informed and to debates and scrutiny, none of which is worth anything compared with a vote in both Houses. While I am on my feet, I may as well repeat my two questions. What will be the enduring value of Protocols 19 and 21, and upon what are both Houses going to be able to vote? Those matters are central to this debate and, if the noble Baroness does not know now, perhaps we should come back to them fairly soon.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c115-6GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Annual reports Immigration controls Jurisdiction EU law Human trafficking EU action EU justice and home affairs Police Prosecutions Parliamentary scrutiny Seasonal workers Schengen Agreement European Court of Justice EU immigration Belarus Multinational companies
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk