Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rosser (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on EU: Justice and Home Affairs.


EU: Justice and Home Affairs

I suspect that I may not get an answer to that, but I asked whether it was felt that either alternative would constitute a change in the treaty and would require a referendum: that is, whether the decision either to opt in or not to opt in to ECJ jurisdiction would be regarded as a change in the treaty and would require a referendum.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c117GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Annual reports Immigration controls Jurisdiction EU law Human trafficking EU action EU justice and home affairs Police Prosecutions Parliamentary scrutiny Seasonal workers Schengen Agreement European Court of Justice EU immigration Belarus Multinational companies
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk