Proceeding contribution from Baroness Browning (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
No, PCPs will not be part of that but of course the new amendment gives them an opportunity to be part of a confirmation process for those appointments. If for some reason the PCC decided to part with the services of the chief finance officer or the chief executive, that PCC would still be accountable to the panel for the reasons why they had done so. There is still that link of accountability, they are answerable to the panel, and if the panel was concerned about the circumstances around that I would expect it to call a scrutiny hearing to find out what had happened and why. I suspect that it would be pretty alert if there was a really serious problem brewing as a result of that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 728 c1813
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Accountability Administration Finance Dismissal Pilot schemes Protection Police Public appointments Police authorities Political impartiality Reform Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:04:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755020
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755020
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755020